The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html Description: Hi, since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well? Regards Daniel |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html > Description: > > Hi, > > since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions > here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well? Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document. Does this seem sufficient? -- Bruce Momjian <[hidden email]> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee |
Hi Bruce,
>On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: >> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html >> Description: >> >> Hi, >> >> since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions >> here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well? >Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI >server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the >attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a >need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document. >Does this seem sufficient? Thanks for looking at it. Seems you attachment is corrupt, at least I can not open it. Can you please resend? Regards Daniel |
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:23:44PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> Hi Bruce, > > >On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > >> > >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html > >> Description: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions > >> here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well? > > >Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI > >server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the > >attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a > >need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document. > >Does this seem sufficient? > > Thanks for looking at it. Seems you attachment is corrupt, at least I can not open it. Can you please resend? It is a gzipp'ed file. I had to use gzip and can't resend it since it contains the T-C-L URL that is flagged by Spamhaus as spam and causes my emails to be marked as spam. You can see the patch here: https://momjian.us/tmp/proc.txt -- Bruce Momjian <[hidden email]> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee |
>On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:23:44PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
>> Hi Bruce, >> >> >On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: >> >> >> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html >> >> Description: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions >> >> here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well? >> >> >Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI >> >server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the >> >attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a >> >need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document. >> >Does this seem sufficient? >> >> Thanks for looking at it. Seems you attachment is corrupt, at least I can not open it. Can you please resend? >It is a gzipp'ed file. I had to use gzip and can't resend it since it >contains the T-C-L URL that is flagged by Spamhaus as spam and causes my >emails to be marked as spam. You can see the patch here: Looks good, thanks. Regards Daniel |
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:38:56PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:23:44PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote: > >> >Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI > >> >server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the > >> >attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a > >> >need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document. > >> >Does this seem sufficient? > >> > >> Thanks for looking at it. Seems you attachment is corrupt, at least I can not open it. Can you please resend? > > >It is a gzipp'ed file. I had to use gzip and can't resend it since it > >contains the T-C-L URL that is flagged by Spamhaus as spam and causes my > >emails to be marked as spam. You can see the patch here: > > Looks good, thanks. Thanks, patch applied through 11. -- Bruce Momjian <[hidden email]> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |