List reclassification

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

List reclassification

Magnus Hagander-2
Per some off-list (...) discussion, it was noted that both pgsql-bugs
and pgsql-docs are listed as "user lists" in our systems, and not
"developer lists":

I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
list, and given how it's used probably also docs?

If there are no objections, I'm going to go ahead and move those two
lists over to "developer lists".

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: List reclassification

Daniel Gustafsson
> On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:55, Magnus Hagander <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
> list, and given how it's used probably also docs?

+1 for moving both -bugs and -docs to be classified as developer lists.

cheers ./daniel


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: List reclassification

Álvaro Herrera
On 2020-Nov-03, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> > On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:55, Magnus Hagander <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
> > list, and given how it's used probably also docs?
>
> +1 for moving both -bugs and -docs to be classified as developer lists.

Another +1 to both


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: List reclassification

Jonathan S. Katz-3
On 11/3/20 9:00 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On 2020-Nov-03, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>>> On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:55, Magnus Hagander <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
>>> list, and given how it's used probably also docs?
>>
>> +1 for moving both -bugs and -docs to be classified as developer lists.
>
> Another +1 to both
+1.

Jonathan


signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: List reclassification

Magnus Hagander-2
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:51 PM Jonathan S. Katz <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On 11/3/20 9:00 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2020-Nov-03, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >
> >>> On 3 Nov 2020, at 10:55, Magnus Hagander <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'd say at least bugs should definitely be considered a developer
> >>> list, and given how it's used probably also docs?
> >>
> >> +1 for moving both -bugs and -docs to be classified as developer lists.
> >
> > Another +1 to both
>
> +1.

I guess +3 should be enough :) I've implemented this change -- it will
take some time before it propagates to all the different systems and
show up.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: https://www.hagander.net/
 Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/