Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging

Simon Riggs

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:13 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I notice log_temp_files is a PGC_USERSET parameter, which is out of step
> with our current thinking on who is allowed to initiate logging.
>
> Is there a rationale for this? Or should we set this to PGC_SUSET like
> all the other logging functions?

Patch enclosed.

--
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([hidden email])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches

log_temp_files_suset.v1.patch (948 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging

Bruce Momjian
Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:13 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I notice log_temp_files is a PGC_USERSET parameter, which is out of step
> > with our current thinking on who is allowed to initiate logging.
> >
> > Is there a rationale for this? Or should we set this to PGC_SUSET like
> > all the other logging functions?
>
> Patch enclosed.

Patch applied, docs updated.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <[hidden email]>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([hidden email])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches