I've been wresting with this problem since 8.0.1 and am able to
duplicate it on 6 different installations. If I compile postgres from source, everything works fine. If I install the RHEL 4 ES RPM, pg_dump silently fails. I've attached two straces, one from 8.0.3 RPM that fails, and one from 8.0.1 that I compiled that doesn't fail (I didn't recompile 8.0.3 from source, but I've experienced this with both 8.0.1 and 8.0.2, so I'm guessing it also works with 8.0.3). In my previous conversations with Devrim, he pointed out that this looks like the line that's causing it to fail: fstat64(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0666, st_rdev=makedev(1, 3), ...}) = 0 ioctl(1, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, 0xbff0c6ec) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device) I assumed that it was just my machine that had a problem, but since, I've installed it on 5 other RHEL machines and every single one has had the same problem. Thanks, Brandon ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Brandon Keepers <[hidden email]> writes:
> I've been wresting with this problem since 8.0.1 and am able to > duplicate it on 6 different installations. If I compile postgres from > source, everything works fine. If I install the RHEL 4 ES RPM, pg_dump > silently fails. Is SELinux in enforcement mode, and if so does turning it off change things? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Brandon Keepers <[hidden email]> writes: > > I've been wresting with this problem since 8.0.1 and am able to > > duplicate it on 6 different installations. If I compile postgres from > > source, everything works fine. If I install the RHEL 4 ES RPM, pg_dump > > silently fails. > > Is SELinux in enforcement mode, and if so does turning it off change > things? Should we check for a buggy SELinux and report a meaningful error message on failure? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [hidden email] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [hidden email]) |
Bruce Momjian <[hidden email]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote: >> Is SELinux in enforcement mode, and if so does turning it off change >> things? > Should we check for a buggy SELinux and report a meaningful error > message on failure? How you intend to do that, exactly? The bug is that it won't let you write on /dev/tty, which puts a pretty severe crimp on *any* reporting. (This is not as insane as it sounds: it's a reasonable security restriction for a daemon process. The error in older SELinux policy files is that they think all the Postgres executables are daemons, not only the postmaster.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend |
In reply to this post by Tom Lane-2
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 13:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is SELinux in enforcement mode, and if so does turning it off change > things? Yup, that was it. If you disable SELinux, everything works. I tried just commenting out line 732 in /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts and that didn't work. Anyone know how to correct this? Brandon |
In reply to this post by Tom Lane-2
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[hidden email]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Is SELinux in enforcement mode, and if so does turning it off change > >> things? > > > Should we check for a buggy SELinux and report a meaningful error > > message on failure? > > How you intend to do that, exactly? The bug is that it won't let you > write on /dev/tty, which puts a pretty severe crimp on *any* reporting. > > (This is not as insane as it sounds: it's a reasonable security > restriction for a daemon process. The error in older SELinux policy > files is that they think all the Postgres executables are daemons, not > only the postmaster.) Throw a message to stderr saying something about SELinux. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [hidden email] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
Bruce Momjian <[hidden email]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote: >> How you intend to do that, exactly? The bug is that it won't let you >> write on /dev/tty, which puts a pretty severe crimp on *any* reporting. > Throw a message to stderr saying something about SELinux. Unless stderr is pointing somewhere else than /dev/tty, this will accomplish exactly zero ... and if it is pointing somewhere else, then the problem doesn't arise. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [hidden email] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
In reply to this post by Brandon Keepers
Brandon Keepers <[hidden email]> writes:
> Yup, that was it. If you disable SELinux, everything works. I tried > just commenting out line 732 > in /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts and that didn't > work. Anyone know how to correct this? I don't know very much about SELinux, but I think the stuff under /etc/selinux is in the nature of "source code", and if you edit it you have to do something to compile it and then load the compiled representation into the kernel. However, the real answer for your problem is to update to a later version of selinux-policy-targeted. Red Hat fixed this awhile ago... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bruce Momjian-2
* Bruce Momjian <[hidden email]> [140605, 14:00]:
> Tom Lane wrote: > > Brandon Keepers <[hidden email]> writes: > > > I've been wresting with this problem since 8.0.1 and am able to > > > duplicate it on 6 different installations. If I compile postgres from > > > source, everything works fine. If I install the RHEL 4 ES RPM, pg_dump > > > silently fails. > > > > Is SELinux in enforcement mode, and if so does turning it off change > > things? > > Should we check for a buggy SELinux and report a meaningful error > message on failure? > Sorry to interfere ;) You might be interested to know that there was a complaint about SELinux blocking OpenOffice too. See ML '[hidden email]' June 13 'Previously working OOo ...' Regards, Ennio. -- [Perche' usare Win$ozz (dico io) se ..."anche uno sciocco sa farlo. \\?// Fa' qualche cosa di cui non sei capace!" (diceva Henry Miller) ] (°|°) [Why use Win$ozz (I say) if ... "even a fool can do that. )=( Do something you aren't good at!" (as Henry Miller used to say) ] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |